4.10 Crime, Delinquency & Arrest Records

The 1980 NLSY79 survey included a special self-report detailing respondents’ participation in and income from delinquent or criminal activities such as skipping school, alcohol/marijuana use, vandalism, shoplifting, drug dealing, robbery, assault, or gambling during the previous twelve month period (see Table 4.10.1 and Table 4.10.2).  Adapted from previously used self-report delinquency scales, this instrument was modified for the NLS to accommodate the confidentiality issues raised by in-home administration.  In addition, it used an expanded response scale to differentiate very highly delinquent youth from occasional participants.  A second set of questions measured involvement with the criminal justice system by assessing the extent of police contacts, resulting criminal convictions, and sentences (probation, incarceration) received.

Table 4.10.1 Number of Respondents Reporting Participation within the Past Year
in Illegal Activities by Gender & Race/Ethnicity: 1980 NLSY79 (Unweighted)

Activity Total Male Female Hispanic Black Non-Black
Non-Hispanic
Respondents Aged 17 & Under1
Runaway 374 180 194 69 71 234
Truant 1845 980 865 395 368 1082
Drinking 2353 1273 1080 373 451 1529
All Respondents
Vandalism 2131 1588 543 313 468 1350
Fighting 3315 2390 925 531 1020 1764
Shoplifting 3040 1716 1324 514 721 1805
Petty Theft 2237 1498 739 297 444 1496
Grand Theft 658 541 117 103 178 377
Robbery 602 466 136 57 222 323
Assault 4395 2812 1583 556 1152 2687
Aggravated Assault 1245 880 365 155 389 701
Marijuana Use 5493 2946 2547 745 1184 3564
Hard Drug Use 2276 1251 1025 272 303 1701
Sold Marijuana 1266 880 386 154 236 876
Sold Hard Drugs 294 208 86 34 57 203
Fraud 2581 1499 1082 335 792 1454
Auto Theft 922 623 299 152 210 560
Breaking/Entering 706 609 97 96 127 483
Fencing 1343 1031 312 221 293 829
Gambling 281 233 48 48 85 148
1 Age calculated as of date of interview.

Table 4.10.2 Number of Respondents Reporting Contact with the Police and/or Criminal Justice System by Gender, Race/Ethnicity & 1979 Family Poverty Status: 1980 NLSY79 (Unweighted)

Gender Race/Ethnicity Poverty Status in 1979
Type of Contact Total Male Female Hispanic Black Non-Black
Non-Hispanic
Status NA1 Not in Poverty In Poverty
Stopped by Police 2248 1734 514 365 517 1366 145 1610 493
Booked or Charged 1325 1056 269 207 269 849 93 913 319
As an Adult 981 812 169 136 202 643 87 686 208
Convicted 753 612 141 111 134 508 57 505 191
Assault 90 77 13 11 25 54 7 62 21
Robbery 49 46 3 8 21 20 5 26 18
Theft 237 180 57 38 42 157 20 147 70
Fraud/Forgery 17 11 6 1 3 13 1 11 5
Fencing 17 15 2 1 6 10 3 8 6
Property Destruction 62 56 6 5 8 49 7 45 10
Other Property Offense 90 83 7 7 15 68 6 51 33
Gambling 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Vice 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0
Drug Offense 106 90 16 7 12 87 9 82 15
Major Traffic Offense 118 104 14 24 8 86 6 91 21
Alcohol Consumption (Minor) 54 41 13 9 2 43 2 41 11
Sentenced Correctional Institution 313 257 56 47 73 193 35 167 111
Youth Correctional 183 139 44 27 41 115 22 83 78
Adult Correctional 157 144 13 24 46 87 17 98 42
1 This refers to individuals for whom the income variable is missing.

Related variables collected during this and other survey years include (1) questions on school discipline problems, e.g., whether each NLSY79 respondent had ever been suspended or expelled from school and when/if the youth had returned to school (see the "School Discipline" section of this guide); (2) the childhood residence section of the 1988 survey, which collected information on whether NLSY79 respondents had resided in a detention center/jail/prison during any of their first eighteen years of life (see the “Family Background” area of interest); and (3) a yearly created ‘Type of Residence’ variable that identifies those NLSY79 respondents who resided in jail at each interview date.  Table 4.10.3 lists the number of respondents that were in jail or prison at time of interview for each round. 

Responses of “in jail” to questions within post-1988 Employer Supplements and the “Gaps Not Working” sections of the main questionnaires for the reason not looking for work when not employed can also be used to identify incarcerated respondents (see the “Between Job Gaps” and “Misc. xxxx” areas of interest).

Table 4.10.3 Number of NLSY79 Respondents in Jail or Prison at Survey Date

Survey Year

Respondents in Prison/Jail

Survey Year

Respondents in Prison/Jail

1979

26

1990

134

1980

63

1991

121

1981

68

1992

138

1982

91

1993

146

1983

104

1994

153

1984

103

1996

150

1985

105

1998

137

1986

115

2000

121

1987

128

2002

110

1988

128

20041 --

1989

139

     

1Data was incomplete for 2004 due to confidentiality concerns regarding inmate's participation
in the NLSY79. These concerns will be remedied for the next round of the NLSY79.

User Notes: Spells of incarceration can be detected by carefully examining the household interview variables from each interview.  If a respondent is in jail or in prison at the time of interview, that information is recorded (see the 'Type of Residence' variables discussion in the "Household Composition" section of this guide).  Users may wish to take into account the perspective an imprisoned NLSY79 respondent brings to answering survey questions.

Crowley (1982) examined nonresponse in the special 1980 data collection and found it to be fairly low.  About 2.5 percent of the sample refused to answer any questions; refusal rates on individual questions ranged from 2.6 to 3.4 percent.  Adults were more likely to refuse to answer than minors, and drug-related offenses had the highest nonresponse rates.  Refusal rates were higher for males, minorities, the economically disadvantaged, and high school dropouts—those expected to have higher rates of illegal activities.  Crowley therefore concludes that a small amount of underreporting probably did take place.

While these illegal activities data are based on self-reports, experts on criminal behavior believe, despite the potential problems with self-reports, that this mode of data collection may be as good as or better than others.  Users should consult the work of experts on these issues.

Survey Instruments: Section 15 (of the 1980 questionnaire) on “Delinquency and Drugs,” Section 16 on “Reported Police Contacts,” and the accompanying confidential Form J contain the delinquency and police contact questions.

Data Files & Documentation: The 71 variables collected during 1980 are found in the “Illegal” area of interest in the main NLSY79 data set.  Background information on the development of the index, the specific procedures used to administer the confidential form, issues intrinsic to measurement of delinquent behavior and criminal activity, and an analysis of the consistency of responses to the various delinquency and police contact measures can be found in two reports authored by Crowley (1981, 1982).

Comparison to Other NLS Cohorts: Beginning in 1988 two sets of questions were asked of NLSY79 children dealing with (1) the extent of each child's self-reported participation during the past year in various illegal activities such as vandalism, shoplifting, and assault and (2) the extent of use and age of first use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, and drugs. Starting in 1994 young adults were also asked a series of questions closely resembling those in the 1980 main NLSY79.

The NLSY97 survey asks about participation in and the intensity of various criminal activities in the previous year (round 1).  In subsequent rounds respondents were questioned about the number of times they participated in criminal activity since the date of last interview.

NLSY97 round 1 youth respondents were also asked whether they had ever been arrested by the police or taken into custody for an illegal or delinquent offense (not including arrests for minor traffic violations) and the total number of times this had happened.  In subsequent rounds, respondents were asked about number of arrests since the last interview. 

The 1968 survey of schools attended by Young Men and Young Women respondents included two questions on whether school records indicated that the respondent had been committed to or was on probation from a correctional institution.  Also as part of the 1968 school survey, school records were examined for an indication that the respondent had ever been expelled or suspended from school.  For more details, consult the BLS website at http://www.bls.gov/nls or the appropriate cohort’s User’s Guide.

References

Crowley, Joan E.  “Crime and Delinquency:  Descriptions and Distributions.”  In Pathways to the Future:  A Longitudinal Study of Young Americans.  Preliminary Report on the 1980 Survey.  Michael E. Borus, ed., Columbus, OH:  CHRR, The Ohio State University, 1981.

Crowley, Joan E.  “Delinquency and Employment:  Substitutions or Spurious Associations.”  In Pathways to the Future Volume II.  A Final Report on the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Labor Market Experience in 1980.  Michael E. Borus, ed., Columbus, OH:  CHRR, The Ohio State University, 1982.


Return to top Return to chapter 4 contents