Search Results

View Selected Citations Select and View All Search Citations

Author: Glaeser, Edward L.

Resulting in 4 citations.

1.	Glaeser, Edward L. Mare, David C.
1.	Cities and Skills NBER Working Paper No. 4728, National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1994. Also: http://nber.nber.org/papers/W4728 Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Keyword(s): Modeling, Fixed Effects; Rural/Urban Differences; Rural/Urban Migration; Transfers, Skill; Variables, Instrumental; Wage Dynamics; Wage Growth; Wage Theory This paper examines the productivity (and wage) gains from locating in dense, urban environments. We distinguish between three potential explanations of why firms are willing to pay urban workers more: (I) the urban wage premium is spurious and is the result of omitted ability measures, (2) the urban wage premium works because cities enhance productivity and (3) the urban wage premium is the result of faster skill accumulation in cities. Using a combination of standard regressions, individual fixed effects estimation (using migrants) and instrumental variables methods, we find that the urban wage premium does not represent omitted ability bias and it is only in part a level effect to productivity. The bulk of the urban wage premium accrues over time as a result of greater skill accumulation in cities.
	Bibliography Citation Glaeser, Edward L. and David C. Mare. "Cities and Skills." NBER Working Paper No. 4728, National Bureau of Economic Research, May 1994.

2.	Glaeser, Edward L. Mare, David C.
2.	Cities and Skills Journal of Labor Economics 19,2 (April 2001): 316-342. Also: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/319563 Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: University of Chicago Press Keyword(s): Human Capital; Migration; Skilled Workers; Skills; Urbanization/Urban Living; Wage Growth; Wage Levels; Wages Workers in cities earn 33% more than their nonurban counterparts. A large amount of evidence suggests that this premium is not just the result of higher ability workers living in cities, which means that cities make workers more productive. Evidence on migrants and the cross effect between urban status and experience implies that a significant fraction of the urban wage premium accrues to workers over time and stays with them when they leave cities. Therefore, a portion of the urban wage premium is a wage growth, not a wage level, effect. This evidence suggests that cities speed the accumulation of human capital.
	Bibliography Citation Glaeser, Edward L. and David C. Mare. "Cities and Skills." Journal of Labor Economics 19,2 (April 2001): 316-342.

3.	Glaeser, Edward L. Sacerdote, Bruce
3.	Why is There More Crime in Cities? NBER Working Paper No. 5430, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 1996. Also: http://nber.nber.org/papers/W5430 Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Keyword(s): Family Structure; Illegal Activities; Urbanization/Urban Living Effect of higher pecuniary benefits, lower arrest probabilities, lower probability of recognition, and characteristics that reflect tastes, social influences, and family structure; based on victimization data; US. Based on results of the National Crime Victimization Survey, the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, and the Uniform Crime Reports. Full-text available on-line: http://nber.nber.org/papers/W5430
	Bibliography Citation Glaeser, Edward L. and Bruce Sacerdote. "Why is There More Crime in Cities?" NBER Working Paper No. 5430, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 1996.

4.	Glaeser, Edward L. Sacerdote, Bruce
4.	Why Is There More Crime in Cities? Journal of Political Economy 107,6 (December 1999): S225-S258. Also: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/250109 Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: University of Chicago Press Keyword(s): Crime; Rural/Urban Differences Crime rates are much higher in big cities than in either small cities or rural areas. This paper explains this connection by using victimization data, evidence from the NLSY on criminal behavior, and the Uniform Crime Reports. Higher pecuniary benefits for crime in large cities can explain at most one-quarter of the connection between city size and crime rates. Lower probabilities of arrest and a lower probability of recognition are features of urban life, but these factors seem to explain at most one-fifth of the urban crime effect. Between one-third and one-half of the urban effect on crime can be explained by the presence of more female-headed households in cities.
	Bibliography Citation Glaeser, Edward L. and Bruce Sacerdote. "Why Is There More Crime in Cities?" Journal of Political Economy 107,6 (December 1999): S225-S258.

Admin