Search Results

Author: Mathios, Alan D.
Resulting in 6 citations.
1. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
A Cross-Country Analysis of Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Over the Life-course
Paris, France, University of Paris: Fourth European Conference on Health Economics, July 7-10, 2002.
Also: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ces/Pages/english/OS12-3.pdf
Cohort(s): Young Women
Publisher: Deutsches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
Keyword(s): Britain, British; British Household Panel Survey (BHPS); Cigarette Use (see Smoking); Cross-national Analysis; German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP); Germany, German; Life Course; Modeling, Hazard/Event History/Survival/Duration; Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID); Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS); Russia, Russian; Wages

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Also presented in Berlin, Germany: Fifth International German Socio-Economic Panel User Conference (GSOEP2002), July 3-4, 2002.

We adopt a life-course perspective to study smoking behavior in Great Britain, Russia, and the United States. Given their different mixes of policies, it is intriguing that the cross-sectional prevalence of smoking in Great Britain and the U.S. is similar, while in Russia men's smoking rates are very high. Our results reveal other similarities and differences that are not apparent in cross-sectional data. For example, we find that the timing of smoking initiation is very similar in most cohorts across the three countries. Another interesting pattern is that the very high smoking prevalence among cohorts of Russian men reflects both high smoking initiation and an almost total lack of smoking cessation. Future research is needed to address a host of questions about the determinants of life-course smoking behavior, including the separate impacts of tobacco control policies on initiation and cessation.

Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "A Cross-Country Analysis of Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Over the Life-course." Paris, France, University of Paris: Fourth European Conference on Health Economics, July 7-10, 2002.
2. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
Accounting for Misclassification Error in Retrospective Smoking Data
Health Economics 13,10 (October 2004): 1031-1044.
Also: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.934/abstract
Cohort(s): NLSY79
Publisher: Wiley Online
Keyword(s): Cigarette Use (see Smoking); Data Analysis; Life Course; Modeling, Mixed Effects; Modeling, Probit

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Recent waves of major longitudinal surveys in the US and other countries include retrospective questions about the timing of smoking initiation and cessation, creating a potentially important but under-utilized source of information on smoking behavior over the life course. In this paper, we explore the extent of, consequences of, and possible solutions to misclassification errors in models of smoking participation that use data generated from retrospective reports. In our empirical work, we exploit the fact that the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 provides both contemporaneous and retrospective information about smoking status in certain years. We compare the results from four sets of models of smoking participation. The first set of results are from baseline probit models of smoking participation from contemporaneously reported information. The second set of results are from models that are identical except that the dependent variable is based on retrospective information. The last two sets of results are from models that take a parametric approach to account for a simple form of misclassification error. Our preliminary results suggest that accounting for misclassification error is important. However, the adjusted maximum likelihood estimation approach to account for misclassification does not always perform as expected. Copyright (c) 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "Accounting for Misclassification Error in Retrospective Smoking Data." Health Economics 13,10 (October 2004): 1031-1044.
3. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
Smoke Or Fog? The Usefulness of Retrospectively Reported Information About Smoking
Addiction 98,9 (September 2003):1307-1314.
Also: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00445.x/abstract
Cohort(s): Mature Women, NLSY79, Older Men, Young Women
Publisher: Wiley Online
Keyword(s): Addiction; Britain, British; British Household Panel Survey (BHPS); Cigarette Use (see Smoking); Cross-national Analysis; Data Analysis; German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP); Germany, German; National Health Interview Survey (NHIS); Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS); Russia, Russian

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Aims to investigate the reliability and validity of retrospectively reported information on smoking. Design: Nationally representative retrospective data from longitudinal surveys and contemporaneous data from repeated cross-sectional surveys were used. Participants: Adult respondents to three of the four samples of the National Longitudinal Surveys Original Cohort 1966-68; the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979; and various waves of the US National Health Interview Survey. Measurements: Reliability was investigated by calculating kappa statistics for repeated measures of ever-smoking and annual-smoking status. Validity was investigated by comparing smoking prevalence rates generated by retrospective data with contemporaneously measured rates. Findings: Kappa statistics indicated the repeated measures of ever-smoking status show substantial agreement; repeated measures of annual-smoking status show moderate agreement. Retrospective reports on smoking behavior produced prevalence rates that match reasonably well with those from contemporaneous reports of smoking behavior. Conclusions: Retrospective data on smoking can be an important resource for tobacco addiction research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "Smoke Or Fog? The Usefulness of Retrospectively Reported Information About Smoking." Addiction 98,9 (September 2003):1307-1314.
4. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
The Roles of High School Completion and GED Receipt in Smoking and Obesity
NBER Working Paper No 11990, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006.
Also: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11990.pdf
Cohort(s): NLSY79
Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Keyword(s): Cognitive Ability; Education; Family Background and Culture; GED/General Educational Diploma/General Equivalency Degree/General Educational Development; Health/Health Status/SF-12 Scale; High School Diploma; Obesity; Smoking (see Cigarette Use); Variables, Instrumental

We analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 to explore the relationships between high school completion and the two leading preventable causes of death--smoking and obesity. We focus on three issues that have received a great deal of attention in research on the pecuniary returns to schooling. First, we investigate whether GED recipients differ from other high school graduates in their smoking and obesity behaviors. Second, we explore the extent to which the relationships between schooling and these health-related behaviors are sensitive to controlling for family background measures and cognitive ability. Third, we estimate instrumental variables (IV) models of the impact of schooling on smoking and obesity. Although our IV estimates are imprecise, both the OLS and IV results tend to suggest that the returns to high school completion include a reduction in smoking. We find little evidence that high school completion is associated with a lower probability of being overweight or obese for either men or women. The results also suggest that the health returns to GED receipt are much smaller than the returns to high school completion.
Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "The Roles of High School Completion and GED Receipt in Smoking and Obesity." NBER Working Paper No 11990, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006.
5. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
The Roles of High School Completion and GED Receipt in Smoking and Obesity
Journal of Labor Economics 24,3 (July 2006): 635-660.
Also: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/504277
Cohort(s): NLSY79
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Keyword(s): GED/General Educational Diploma/General Equivalency Degree/General Educational Development; High School; High School Completion/Graduates; Obesity; Schooling; Smoking (see Cigarette Use)

We analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 on high school completion, smoking, and obesity. First, we investigate whether GED recipients differ from other high school graduates in their smoking and obesity behaviors. Second, we explore whether the relationships between schooling and these health-related behaviors are sensitive to controlling for background and ability measures. Third, we estimate instrumental variables models. Our results suggest that the returns to high school completion may include less smoking but the health returns to GED receipt are much smaller. We find little evidence that high school completion is associated with less obesity.
Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "The Roles of High School Completion and GED Receipt in Smoking and Obesity." Journal of Labor Economics 24,3 (July 2006): 635-660.
6. Kenkel, Donald S.
Lillard, Dean R.
Mathios, Alan D.
Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Cessation: A Cross-Country Analysis
Presented: Berlin, Germany, Fifth International German Socio-Economic Panel User Conference (GSOEP2002), July 3-4, 2002
Cohort(s): Young Women
Publisher: Deutsches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin)
Keyword(s): Britain, British; British Household Panel Survey (BHPS); Cigarette Use (see Smoking); Cross-national Analysis; Gender Differences; German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP); Germany, German; Life Course; Modeling, Hazard/Event History/Survival/Duration; Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID); Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS); Russia, Russian

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Also presented: Paris, France, University of Paris: Fourth European Conference on Health Economics, July 7-10, 2002

Tobacco control policies range from high excise taxes, to direct restrictions on smoking in public places, to the regulation of pharmaceutical products that aid smoking cessation. In this paper we depart from the standard cross-sectional approach and instead adopt a life course perspective to study the impact of tobacco control policies across countries -- Great Britain, Germany, Russia, and the United States. Of the four countries we study, Great Britain taxes cigarettes most heavily - the price of cigarettes in Great Britain are more than twice the average price in Germany, and are more than six times the average price in the Russian Federation. The U.S. has the most restrictions on smoking in public places and the least restrictions on the sale of smoking cessation products. For example, in the U.S. nicotine patches are allowed to be sold widely over-the-counter, while in Great Britain, Germany and the Russian Federation these products are available only in pharmacies or by prescription. Given the different mixes of tobacco control policies, it is intriguing to note that the prevalence of smoking in Great Britain and the U.S. is fairly similar, while in Germany smoking rates are somewhat higher and in Russia smoking rates are very high for men but much lower for women. According to Corrao et al. (2000), the 1996 British smoking prevalence rate was 29 percent for males and 28 percent for females; the 1997 U.S. smoking prevalence was 28 percent for males and 22 percent for females; the 1997 German smoking prevalence was 43 percent for males and 30 percent for females; and the 1996 Russian smoking prevalence was 63 percent for males and 13 percent for females. While some part of these differences are likely due to differences in cultural norms about smoking, it is likely that the mix of tobacco control policies in each country also plays an important role. In this paper we lay the groundwork for researchers to take advantage of large differences across countries in tobacco control policies. To do so, we first summarize available information on tobacco control policies in force in each country. We then document in several ways the rates of smoking in Germany, Great Britain, Russia, and the U.S. In particular we describe the life course patterns of smoking by men and women in each country over time. Finally, we present preliminary econometric results from a discrete time hazard model of a sample of U.S. women smokers? decisions.

Full-text available on-line at: http://www.diw.de/deutsch/abteilungen/ldm/archiv/ar2002/gsoep2002/abstracts/kenkel_lillard_mathios.pdf

Bibliography Citation
Kenkel, Donald S., Dean R. Lillard and Alan D. Mathios. "Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Cessation: A Cross-Country Analysis." Presented: Berlin, Germany, Fifth International German Socio-Economic Panel User Conference (GSOEP2002), July 3-4, 2002.