Search Results

Author: McGinnis, Sandra L.
Resulting in 2 citations.
1. McGinnis, Sandra L.
Child Well-Being in Cohabiting Homes: A Study of Outcomes and Processes
Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York At Albany, 2004. DAI-A 64/12, p. 4644, June 2004
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79, NLSY79 Young Adult
Publisher: UMI - University Microfilms, Bell and Howell Information and Learning
Keyword(s): Behavior Problems Index (BPI); CESD (Depression Scale); Child Self-Administered Supplement (CSAS); Children, Behavioral Development; Cognitive Development; Cohabitation; Depression (see also CESD); Family Characteristics; Family Structure; Home Environment; Home Observation for Measurement of Environment (HOME); Locus of Control (see Rotter Scale); Marital Status; Parenting Skills/Styles; Parents, Single; Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Math); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Reading); Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC); Stepfamilies; Temperament

Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79 and Children of the NLSY79), 1992 through 1998, are used to assess the effects of living in a cohabiting home on the emotional, cognitive/scholastic, and behavioral outcomes of children ages 0-22. Children in cohabiting family structures are compared to those in other family structures (married biological families, single-mother families, and married stepfamilies). The effects of living in a biological cohabiting family (where two unmarried, biological parents are present), and living in a cohabiting stepfamily (where a biological parent and the parent's unmarried partner are present) are also compared. Hypotheses are tested about the processes by which cohabiting family structure affects child outcomes, with emphasis on the mediating effects of socioeconomic status, child's experience of family transitions, and quality of the home environment in terms of cognitive stimulation and emotional support. Although many differences appeared between children in cohabiting families and those in married families, most of these differences were explained by controls for socioeconomic and family characteristics. After controlling for these factors, children in biological cohabiting homes typically did not differ from children in biological married homes, and children in cohabiting stepfamilies did not typically differ from children in married stepfamilies. The overall finding is that living in a cohabiting household does not disadvantage children in terms of most outcomes, provided that the family's socioeconomic standing and various aspects of family functioning are comparable to those of other families. Cohabiting families do not appear to be inherently inferior to other families so far as providing for children's levels of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral well-being. Rather, these families are economically disadvantaged, have experienced more instability in the form of the mother's union transitions, and tend to provide less cognitive stimulation and emotional support to children than the traditional biological married family. The results seem to imply that the best way to encourage positive emotional, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes for children is to improve the socioeconomic status of families with children, and to improve the home environments of children by teaching and encouraging sound parenting skills.
Bibliography Citation
McGinnis, Sandra L. Child Well-Being in Cohabiting Homes: A Study of Outcomes and Processes. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York At Albany, 2004. DAI-A 64/12, p. 4644, June 2004.
2. McGinnis, Sandra L.
Fathering in Reconstituted Families: The Effects of Maternal Cohabitation and Remarriage on Children's Relationships with Fathers and Father-Figures
Presented: Boston, MA, Eastern Sociological Society Meetings, March 2002
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79
Publisher: Eastern Sociological Society
Keyword(s): Cohabitation; Family Structure; Fathers, Presence; Stepfamilies

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Few studies compare the effects of maternal cohabitation with the effects of maternal remarriage on children's relationships with their biological father and their residential father-figure (mother's partner or spouse) in mother-custody homes, and those studies which exist have important limitations. The results of some previous studies indicate that maternal marital or partner status may have effects on a child's relationship with the biological father, but these effects are not analyzed in depth. Very few studies have compared the child-stepfather relationship across both married and cohabiting stepfamilies. Given the potential importance of relationships with fathers and figures to child outcomes, the effects of maternal cohabitation and remarriage on these relationships merit deeper investigation.

The current study examines the impact of maternal cohabitation and remarriage on children's father/father-figure relationships, using longitudinal data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979 Child cohort. Data will be taken from the 1998 survey year. Children of never-married, divorced, and separated mothers are included. Dependent variables differ by child's age, with greater use of child-report data for older children. The relationships between children and fathers under age ten will be assessed by mother report of child-father closeness and child involvement with father-figures. For children ages ten to fourteen, measures of father involvement, time with father, father closeness, stepfather involvement, time with stepfather, and stepfather closeness will be constructed directly from child reports. For children ages fifteen and up, dependent variables will be child reports of frequency of visitation and phone conversations with the nonresident father. The payment of child support will be examined for children of all ages using maternal reports. It is hypothesized that maternal cohabitation is associated with child relationships with the biological father both directly, and through a spurious selection effect. There is some evidence that nonresident fathers feel displaced when another potential father-figure enters the child's life. This effect is not expected, however, to be as strong for maternal cohabitation as it will be for maternal remarriage, as the child's relationship with the new father-figure is more tenuous in cohabitations than remarriages. Selection effects are also expected to be very different between maternal cohabitation and maternal remarriage. Cohabiting mothers are expected to be of a lower socioeconomic status on average than remarried mothers, and previous evidence indicates that maternal education is positively associated with father-child contact in disrupted families. Mother SES is also likely to be correlated with father SES, and father SES is also positively associated with father-child contact and payment of child support. In part because of the socioeconomic effect, it is also expected that children of never-married parents will be more heavily represented in cohabiting than in remarried households, and fathers are less likely to see and contribute to children if the children were not born in marriage....The study uses ordinary least-squares and logistic regression to examine these hypotheses, with special attention paid to separating spurious effects based on selection from direct effects caused by maternal marital/cohabitation status.

Bibliography Citation
McGinnis, Sandra L. "Fathering in Reconstituted Families: The Effects of Maternal Cohabitation and Remarriage on Children's Relationships with Fathers and Father-Figures." Presented: Boston, MA, Eastern Sociological Society Meetings, March 2002.