Search Results
Author: Stoll, Michael A.
Resulting in 2 citations.
| 1. |
Holzer, Harry J. Raphael, Steven Stoll, Michael A. |
|
Employment Barriers Facing Ex-Offenders Discussion Paper of The Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, May 19-20, 2003. Also: http://www.urban.org/uploadedPDF/410855_holzer.pdf Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: Urban Institute Keyword(s): Employment; Incarceration/Jail; Labor Force Participation; Labor Market Studies, Geographic Over 600,000 people are now being released from prisons each year. Many suffer from a variety of serious difficulties as they attempt to reenter society. Among the most challenging situations they face is that of reentry into the labor market. Employment rates and earnings of exoffenders are low by almost any standard—though in most cases they were fairly low even before these (mostly) men were incarcerated. Low employment rates seem closely related to the very high recidivism rates observed among those released from prison. Why are the employment and earnings of ex-offenders so low? What barriers do they face in gaining employment and in achieving earnings that are sufficient to live on independently? To what extent are these barriers based on their own characteristics and attitudes, as opposed to those of employers? Are there policies that are likely to reduce these barriers, and thereby improve employment and earnings among ex-offenders? We review these issues in this paper. We begin by reviewing some evidence on the employment and earnings of ex-offenders. We then consider the barriers that appear to limit their employment opportunities—first on the supply side (i.e., their own characteristics and attitudes), and then on the demand side (i.e., those of employers) of the labor market. We also consider some potentially positive factors that will influence the employment prospects of ex-offenders over the next few decades—particularly, the growing tightness of the labor market that most economists expect in the future due to the impending retirements of the “baby boomers” generation. Finally, we review a range of policies that might reduce some of the barriers faced by ex-offenders in the labor market. |
|
|
Bibliography Citation
Holzer, Harry J., Steven Raphael and Michael A. Stoll. "Employment Barriers Facing Ex-Offenders." Discussion Paper of The Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable, May 19-20, 2003. |
| 2. |
Stoll, Michael A. |
|
When Jobs Move, Do Black and Latino Men Lose? The Effect of Growth in Job Decentralisation on Young Men's Jobless Incidence and Duration Urban Studies 35,12 (December 1998): 2221-2239 Cohort(s): NLSY79 Publisher: University of Glasgow Keyword(s): Demography; Economics of Discrimination; Economics of Minorities; Economics, Regional; Labor Market Studies, Geographic; Modeling; Quits; Retirement/Retirement Planning; Rural/Urban Migration; Unemployment; Urban and Regional Planning Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher. The spatial mismatch hypothesis suggests that the movement of jobs from central cities to suburbs negatively affects blacks' employment both absolutely and relative to whites. In this paper, data are used from the 1984 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and the 1972 and 1982 US Census of Industries to examine the effect of growth in metropolitan job decentralisation on young males' jobless incidence and duration. Overall, growth in job decentralisation is found to affect negatively young black and Latino males' jobless incidence and duration. In addition, the metropolitan unemployment rate is found to affect negatively young black males' jobless incidence and durations only. Thus, the combination of full employment policies with policies to alter the distribution of jobs in metropolitan areas in favour of the central city will do more to improve young black and Latino males' labour market position than either approach by itself. |
|
|
Bibliography Citation
Stoll, Michael A. "When Jobs Move, Do Black and Latino Men Lose? The Effect of Growth in Job Decentralisation on Young Men's Jobless Incidence and Duration." Urban Studies 35,12 (December 1998): 2221-2239.
|