Search Results

Source: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Resulting in 5 citations.
1. Bjorklund, Anders
Bratsberg, Bernt
Eriksson, Tor
Jantti, Markus
Naylor, Robin
Raaum, Oddbjorn
Roed, Knut
Osterbacka, Eva
Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom and the United States: An Overview
Working Paper, Abo Akademi University, Abo, Finland, 2005.
Also: http://www.creato.no/espe_2004/sider/pdf/osterbacka.pdf
Cohort(s): Older Men, Young Men
Publisher: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Keyword(s): Britain, British; Cross-national Analysis; Denmark, Danish; Fathers and Children; Fathers and Sons; Finland, Finnish; Gender Differences; Intergenerational Patterns/Transmission; Mobility; Mobility, Economic; Norway, Norwegian; Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID)

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Also: Presented: Bergen, Norway, European Society for Population Economics, June 2004.

The present paper examines the extent of intergenerational earnings mobility in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and the United States. We examine income mobility among pairs of fathers and sons as well as fathers and daughters using both mobility matrices and regression and correlation coefficients. Our results suggest that while all countries exhibit substantial income persistence across generations, especially in the tails of the distribution, there is greater persistence of rich rather than poor incomes among men, there is less income persistence in the Nordic countries and daughters are more mobile than men.

Bibliography Citation
Bjorklund, Anders, Bernt Bratsberg, Tor Eriksson, Markus Jantti, Robin Naylor, Oddbjorn Raaum, Knut Roed and Eva Osterbacka. "Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom and the United States: An Overview." Working Paper, Abo Akademi University, Abo, Finland, 2005.
2. Bjorklund, Anders
Ginther, Donna K.
Sundstrom, Marianne
Does Marriage Matter for Kids? The Impact of Legal Marriage on Child Outcomes
Presented: Bergen, Norway, XVIII Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics, June 2004.
Also: http://www.creato.no/espe_2004/sider/pdf/Sundstrom_abstr.pdf
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79
Publisher: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Keyword(s): Behavior Problems Index (BPI); Children, Academic Development; Children, Behavioral Development; Children, Well-Being; Cohabitation; Family Structure; Marriage; Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Math); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Reading); Sweden, Swedish

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

The association between marriage and positive outcomes for children has been documented in numerous studies. For example, McLanahan and Sandefur (1994) show that educational, fertility, and inactivity outcomes for children who grow up with a single-parent or stepparent are far worse than for those children who grow up in an intact family with both (married) biological parents. However, the causal effect of marriage on child outcomes is difficult to identify because marriage is not randomly assigned. Most previous studies of the impact of marriage are plagued by this selection problem. Despite the positive associations between marriage and outcomes, cohabitation is increasing in the U.S. and is ubiquitous in Sweden. In 2000 3.7 percent of household were cohabiting unions in the U.S. Cohabitation in Sweden is more common than anywhere else in the industrialized world, and, although it is more similar to legal marriage than is the case in the U.S., it does not have the same legal implications, e.g. in case of separation or death. Examining the effects of marriage and cohabitation in the U.S: and Sweden allow us to determine whether legal marriage confers benefits to children beyond the similar but less formal ties of cohabitation. This topic is very timely given the Bush Administration's investment of $1.5 billion to promote healthy marriage in the U. S. We address the following research questions: Does legal status of the union matter for children's outcomes? Is it the biological relationship, the quality, or the legal status of their union that confers advantages on children in Sweden and the U.S.? How do children's educational outcomes compare for those residing with cohabiting parents (both biologically related to the children) and those residing with married biological parents and single-parent families in the U.S. and Sweden? How do the results from Sweden inform United States policies that seek to promote healthy marriage?

We use two data sets for the U.S. The first sample is taken from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79) and the second is the 2000 wave of the NLSY-Child which contains information from 3,425 women with 8,323 children. Combining information from the NLSY79 marital/cohabitating history of their mothers and questions about family structure in the NLSY-Child we create a family structure history. This allow us to distinguish between children living with married biological parents, cohabiting parents, single mothers, mothers married to stepfathers, and mothers cohabiting with unrelated males. We use a number of educational outcomes. For children from ages 5 to 15 we have assessment instruments including three Peabody Individual Achievement Tests (PIAT) for reading and math and the Behavior Problems index which measures a child's anti-social behavior. For children over the ages of 15 we observe school enrollment status and highest grade completed. Explanatory variables include demographic characteristics, parental education, number of siblings, and family income.

For Sweden we use a random sample of children born 1974-84 drawn from the population registers. The data sample roughly 20 percent of Swedish children born each year from 1974-84 and their siblings. The total sample size is over 300,000 child observations. This data is combined with family and individual information from the censuses from 1965, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985 and 1990. Our outcome variables are grade point average at age 16, high school graduation at age 19, and years of schooling and earnings for older children in the sample. We create marital history--length of cohabitation and length of marriage-- for the parents using information from the bidecennial censuses from 1990 and before and tax records after 1990. Our explanatory variables include the sibling composition of the household (his children, her children, and their joint biological children), the educational attainment and earnings of the adults in the household, and whether the family lives in an urban area.

Identifying the causal effect of marriage on outcomes is complicated by the selection problem. We use IV-methods as well as fixed-effect models to deal with this problem.

Bibliography Citation
Bjorklund, Anders, Donna K. Ginther and Marianne Sundstrom. "Does Marriage Matter for Kids? The Impact of Legal Marriage on Child Outcomes." Presented: Bergen, Norway, XVIII Annual Conference of the European Society for Population Economics, June 2004.
3. Flinn, Christopher Jay
Brown, Meta
Investment in Child Quality over Marital States
Presented: Bilbao, Spain, European Society for Population Economics (ESPE), June 12-15, 2002.
Also: http://www.eco.rug.nl/~espe2002/Book_of_Abstracts.pdf
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY97
Publisher: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Keyword(s): Divorce; Fathers, Involvement; Household Composition; Income; Marriage; Methods/Methodology; Parental Marital Status; Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Math); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Reading); Test Scores/Test theory/IRT

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

Policy governing divorce and parenting, such as child support enforcement, child custody regulations and laws controlling marital dissolution, takes as its objective the optimization of some combination of parents? and children?s welfare. While recent research has produced strong evidence on the effects of such policies as unilateral divorce and child support enforcement on divorce rates, information on the child welfare impact of divorce policies would be of use in evaluating the desirability of stabilizing the marginal marriage. Additionally, we expect that changes in the regulatory environment induce changes in the distribution of resources within intact and divided families. This paper presents a continuous time model of parents? marital status choices and investments in children, with the goal of determining how policies toward divorce influence outcomes for children and the distribution of resources within the family. The model addresses the detrimental effects of both realized and impending divorce on child outcomes that we observe in the NLSY, and simulated data based on the model replicates observed patterns in parents? marital status, parents? child investment behavior and outcomes for children.
Bibliography Citation
Flinn, Christopher Jay and Meta Brown. "Investment in Child Quality over Marital States." Presented: Bilbao, Spain, European Society for Population Economics (ESPE), June 12-15, 2002.
4. Kotikula, Aphichoke
Abortion and Child Outcomes
Presented: New York, NY, European Society for Population Economics, 17th Annual Congress, June 2003.
Also: Johns Hopkins University, Oct 2002; http://www.econ.nyu.edu/cvstarr/conferences/ESPE/papers/kotikulaa.pdf
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79
Publisher: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Keyword(s): Abortion; Endogeneity; Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Math); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Reading); Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT); Pregnancy and Pregnancy Outcomes

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

This study develops a framework to answer the hypothetical question: what would child outcomes be, had the woman made a different decision about abortion during the pregnancy? I measure and test the significance of the differences between child outcomes from assuming two conditions hold: a) the women not having abortions bring their pregnancies to term and b) the women who had abortions have children later. My study is confined to the abortion decision in the first pregnancy. Due to the panel structure of the child outcome data, the random effects model is the primary estimation technique. Even after controlling for a woman's family background factors, endogeneity in abortion decision might persist. This study used variables relating to the state-level abortion accessibility as instrumental variables in order to deal with this problem. My findings show that the abortion decision significantly improves child outcomes in mathematical test and reading recognition test but not in reading comprehension test or vocabulary test. The explanation is that the timing of pregnancy is important and will influence the child outcomes.
Bibliography Citation
Kotikula, Aphichoke. "Abortion and Child Outcomes." Presented: New York, NY, European Society for Population Economics, 17th Annual Congress, June 2003.
5. Ozturk, Orgul Demet
Chyi, Hau
Welfare and Work Participation of Single Mothers and Children's Cognitive Development
Presented: Chicago, IL, European Society for Population Economics, June 14-16, 2007.
Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79
Publisher: European Society for Population Economics (ESPE)
Keyword(s): Aid for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC); Maternal Employment; Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Math); Peabody Individual Achievement Test (PIAT- Reading); Welfare

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

The effects of single mothers' welfare participation and work decisions on children's outcomes are important. First, theories and empirical studies regarding the effects of mothers' work on children's attainments yield ambiguous findings. Second, participating in AFDC also exhibits a negative statistical relationship with the participating children's possible outcomes of all sorts in the data. We develop a dynamic structural model of a single mother's work and welfare participation decisions while their children are young. This model is used to measure the effects of mothers' decisions on children's attainments in the short run. Using NLSY79 children's PIAT Math test scores as a measure of attainment, we find that single mother's work and welfare use in the first five years of her child's life both have positive effect on her child's outcome, but this effect declines by the initial ability. The higher the potential ability of child, the lower the positive impact work and welfare have. In fact, in case of welfare the effect is negative if child has more than about median initial ability.. Furthermore, we find that work requirement reduces a single mother's use of welfare. However, the net effect of work requirement on a child's test score depends on whether mother's work brings in enough labor income to compensate for the loss of welfare benefits. We also look at the implications of welfare eligibility time limit, child bonus, and maternal leave, on child's outcome.
Bibliography Citation
Ozturk, Orgul Demet and Hau Chyi. "Welfare and Work Participation of Single Mothers and Children's Cognitive Development." Presented: Chicago, IL, European Society for Population Economics, June 14-16, 2007.