Search Results

Source: Journal of Economics and Management Strategy
Resulting in 2 citations.
1. Chen, Jing
Selection and Serial Entrepreneurs
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 22,2 (Summer 2013): 281-311.
Also: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jems.12016/abstract
Cohort(s): NLSY79
Publisher: Wiley Online
Keyword(s): Entrepreneurship; Learning Hypothesis; Modeling, Fixed Effects

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

There is substantial evidence that serial entrepreneurs outperform de novo entrepreneurs. But is this positive association between prior experience and performance the result of learning by doing or of selection on ability? This paper proposes a strategy that combines the fixed-effects model and IV estimations to distinguish empirically selection effects from learning. Using panel data from the NLSY79, I find that selection on ability is the more important determinant of serial business formation and the early performance of new businesses. In contrast, the effects of learning by doing are apparent only when the analysis focuses on founding new startups in sectors closely related to entrepreneurs’ previous ventures.
Bibliography Citation
Chen, Jing. "Selection and Serial Entrepreneurs." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 22,2 (Summer 2013): 281-311.
2. Hartog, Joop
van Praag, C. Mirjam
van der Sluis, Justin
If You Are So Smart, Why Aren't You an Entrepreneur? Returns to Cognitive and Social Ability: Entrepreneurs Versus Employees
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 19,4 (Winter 2010): 947-989.
Also: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00274.x
Cohort(s): NLSY79
Publisher: Wiley Online
Keyword(s): Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB); Earnings; Entrepreneurship; Noncognitive Skills

Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher.

How valuable are cognitive and social abilities for entrepreneurs' relative to employees' earnings? We answer three questions: (1) To what extent does a composite measure of ability affect an entrepreneur's earnings relative to wages earned by employees? (2) Do different cognitive abilities (e.g., math ability, language, or verbal ability) and social ability affect earnings of entrepreneurs and employees differently?, and (3) Does the balance in these measured ability levels affect an individual's earnings? Our (difference-of-difference) estimates of the returns to ability for spells in entrepreneurship versus wage employment account for selectivity into entrepreneurial positions insofar as they are determined by fixed individual characteristics. Our robust results provide the following answers to the three questions: General ability has a stronger impact on entrepreneurial incomes than on wages. Moreover, entrepreneurs and employees benefit from different sets of specific abilities: verbal and clerical abilities have a stronger impact on wages, whereas mathematical, social, and technical ability are more valuable for entrepreneurs. The balance in the various kinds of ability also generates a higher income, but only for entrepreneurs: This finding supports Lazear's Jack-of-all-Trades theory.
Bibliography Citation
Hartog, Joop, C. Mirjam van Praag and Justin van der Sluis. "If You Are So Smart, Why Aren't You an Entrepreneur? Returns to Cognitive and Social Ability: Entrepreneurs Versus Employees." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 19,4 (Winter 2010): 947-989.