Search Results
Author: Yazici, Esel Y.
Resulting in 3 citations.
| 1. |
Yazici, Esel Y. |
|
Consequences of Medicaid Expansions on Three Outcomes: Demand for Private Insurance, Infant and Child Health, and Labor Supply Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York, 1997 Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79 Publisher: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) Keyword(s): Benefits, Insurance; Birthweight; Child Health; Children, Health Care; Children, Illness; Children, Poverty; Health Care; Health, Chronic Conditions; Medicaid/Medicare; National Health Interview Survey (NHIS); Pre-natal Care/Exposure Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher. In the mid-1980s, Congress expanded Medicaid coverage to near-poor pregnant women and children. The aim was to provide health insurance coverage to the uninsured and increase their utilization of health care services. Beginning with the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, the link between Medicaid eligibility and other cash assistance programs was severed. Low-income pregnant women and children, who initially did not fit into traditional welfare categories, gained access to publicly financed health care. These expansions in eligibility produced a sharp rise in the number of children and pregnant women covered by Medicaid. The expansions in Medicaid eligibility had intended and unintended consequences on several outcomes. First of these was on private health insurance. There was a possibility that near-poor individuals who initially had private coverage switched to Medicaid. Since this indicates only a shift in financing of care from private to public insurance, the consequence would be little or no change in health care utilization and health. In the first essay, I found that Medicaid expansions had no effect on privately covered individuals, but a large impact on those who were initially uninsured. The second potential consequence of Medicaid expansions was on infant and child health outcomes. Even though expanded eligibility gave rise to a substantial increase in enrollment rates, the effectiveness of the public program was conditional on improving the health of infants and children. In the second essay, the effect of Medicaid on infant and child health has been extensively examined and only limited evidence has been found on Medicaid coverage improving health outcomes. A third possible effect of the Medicaid expansions was on labor supply and welfare participation of female heads. Elimination of the link between the cash assistance program and Medicaid created new incentives in the labor markets for welfare recipients. The expected consequences were an increase in labor supply and reduction in welfare rolls. I analyzed this issue in the third essay and found very little evidence on the effect of Medicaid on labor supply and welfare participation for female heads. |
|
|
Bibliography Citation
Yazici, Esel Y. Consequences of Medicaid Expansions on Three Outcomes: Demand for Private Insurance, Infant and Child Health, and Labor Supply. Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York, 1997. |
| 2. |
Yazici, Esel Y. Kaestner, Robert |
|
Medicaid Expansions and the Crowding Out of Private Health Inquiry 37,1 (2000): 23-32 Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79 Publisher: Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization Keyword(s): Benefits, Insurance; Child Health; Children, Health Care; Health Care; Medicaid/Medicare; Poverty Permission to reprint the abstract has not been received from the publisher. This paper re-examines the magnitude of crowd out among children. We use longitudinal data that allow us to identify and differentiate groups of children based on whether their eligibility for Medicaid was affected by the program's eligibility expansions. We investigate whether changes in insurance coverage of children affected by the expansions differed from changes in insurance coverage of children unaffected by the expansions. For example, we directly measure whether there was a greater decrease in private insurance coverage among children who became eligible for Medicaid than among children whose eligibility was unaffected. Our results suggest that there was relatively little crowd out among children. We estimate that 18.9% of the recent increase in Medicaid enrollment came from private insurance. |
|
|
Bibliography Citation
Yazici, Esel Y. and Robert Kaestner. "Medicaid Expansions and the Crowding Out of Private Health." Inquiry 37,1 (2000): 23-32.
|
| 3. |
Yazici, Esel Y. Kaestner, Robert |
|
Medicaid Expansions and the Crowding Out of Private Health Insurance NBER Working Paper No. 6527, National Bureau of Economic Research, April 1998. Also: http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6527.pdf Cohort(s): Children of the NLSY79, NLSY79 Publisher: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Keyword(s): Benefits, Insurance; Children, Health Care; Health Care; Medicaid/Medicare; Poverty In this paper, we re-examine the question of crowd out among children. Our primary contribution is the use of longitudinal data. These data allow us to identify several groups of children depending on whether their eligibility for Medicaid was affected by the eligibility expansions, and to investigate whether changes in insurance coverage of children affected by the expansions differed from changes in insurance coverage of children unaffected by the expansions. For example, we directly measure whether children who became eligible for Medicaid due to the expansions decreased their enrollment in private insurance plans faster than children whose eligibility for Medicaid was unaffected by the expansions. Our results suggest that there was relatively little crowd out among children. We estimate that 14.5 percent of the recent increase in Medicaid enrollment came from private insurance. |
|
|
Bibliography Citation
Yazici, Esel Y. and Robert Kaestner. "Medicaid Expansions and the Crowding Out of Private Health Insurance." NBER Working Paper No. 6527, National Bureau of Economic Research, April 1998. |